Dienstag, 27. Januar 2015
Action has a recursive structure and thereby it is a core that there is congruence between execution and reason. In other words: what you wish to achieve. Reason is reduced to the combination of a goal and motivation. So it can be integrated into a dynamical functioning. A goal alone will not work. The goal is qualified by motivation! Motivation, in fact, works as an input. Where, again, history has a role to play. Sometimes it is import to adapt the function. In past, and future. Although it is possible that in the future uncertain factors may play their role so that backward regression is possible. You get information inwards from every step that you are able to control! These steps get then in comparison with satisfaction conditions.
It is always so that situation has be taken into account with every change. Which goes together with doing certain things not. There is as a matter of fact some kind of splitting of motivation and a multiplication of indices. This is the controlling process! The motivational function within different roles. Whereby satisfaction-functions are responsible for setting limits. Needs are in fact defined in the meaning of limits!
The full structure of action is taken up by intention. Action detects! So, and only so you can know what you are doing. This is although only really possible at motivational intention. The final situation isn't possible to understand, it is unconscious and it is collective. This is called formulation intention. So, there is no real social control; by definition.
The simple steps that have to be done when you are using intention deliberative is focus on goal, adaptation as quick as possible and accurateness. Whereby the rule is valid that prior intention is just an extension of the cognitive architecture. We are doing this all the time. In this way we can survive in the social world. It is a weak spot, which is just a weak spot in clear sight, and understanding each other. It isn't play! Things that are also taken into account are the attraction for someone to have certain goals, the type or level of action and the relevance. Relevance is split up in fluency and necessity. This is one big deal! Also the controlling instance is very important. It is important to know if certain thing are done by purpose or not. Accidents have to be defined and given less relevance. This is about collective learning, and the memory you have by means of intention. In a collective way. So the distinction can be made between intentional movement and agent-based movement. Last one is collective and is based on witnessing.
The first person perspective is about how you experience this all yourself. Motivation is conscious, movement in part and mostly not. Fluency is mostly regarded as a manner to decide that some action is intentional. But fluency is not necessarily needed for something to be agent-based. Hereby the distinction is made between going off from salience (motivation) or automaticity (formulation). This last one is thus the intersubjective mode. Basic motivation goes together with basic needs. But at the collective side there can't be why-questions. Although there are two constraints: orientation and fluidity. Motivation as constraint is difficult. Into the coordination categories and schemas can be used. Dealing with risks has to be part to decide if collective action is really there. Also revision out of summary has to play a role and this by means of a repertoire. Adjustment is by definition automatic, but remains in exact means hidden.